Trump's legal team argued against his gag order in his upcoming election interference trial. AdvertisementA panel of three judges on Monday appeared highly skeptical of arguments from Donald Trump's legal team seeking to revoke a gag order that bars him from attacking potential witnesses in his election interference criminal case. Depending on "the context," Lauro argued, Trump would be permitted to pressure possible witnesses not to cooperate with prosecutors. The gag order in the election interference case is separate from a gag order in another ongoing civil trial against Trump in New York. He found that Trump violated it earlier in November, though an appeals court on Thursday temporarily lifted the order.

---

Persons: Trump, —, Donald Trump's, John Lauro, Lauro, Patricia Millet, X, Mike Pence, — Lauro, Tanya Chutkan, they've, Sam Bankman, Cornelia Pillard, Laura, Jack Smith, Mark Meadows, weaklings, Chutkan, MANDEL NGAN, Millet, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Smith, Cecil Woods VanDevender, Bill Barr, We've, Judge Arthur Engoron Organizations: Prosecutors, Service, United States, Appeals, DC Circuit, Trump, US, Capitol, Justice Department, Republican, Getty Locations: New York, FTX, AFP